​​By Steve Richards

Note to Readers:
This essay was written before the shootings in Atlanta but the echoes between the two are striking for at least three reasons:

• The anti-immigrant sentiment of the folks in the essay and the anti-Asian hate crimes taking place throughout the country,
• The use of a gun for the massacre
• The claim of the shooter that he "Loved Guns and God" (https://www.thedailybeast.com/seven-killed-in-shootings-at-atlanta-spas).

In other words, a terrifying candidate for the NkRA.​

So, I’ve been hired by the NkRA (Neo-Know Nothing Religion of the Armed) to head up its proselytizing department as a consultant.

It doesn’t pay much but I’m happy to be helping out and thought that the first thing I should do is compare the original Know Nothing party of Lincoln’s day with the Neo-Know Nothing Republicans (NKRs or Knickers) of today. Kind of a psychographic review of our prospective members - get into their heads if you will.

But first, the demographics, which are pretty simple for such a homogenous group like ours. How so? The original Know Nothings of the 1800’s were largely White, Anglo Saxon, and Protestant. Today’s Knickers are pretty much the same. Not surprising so let’s move on…

Next, the original Know Nothings were anti-immigrant and fought against the citizenship of immigrants – and their voting - by just about any means possible. Which seems like something most Knickers can relate to given their focus on migrants from South of the border, the Muslim ban (darn Biden), the Wall, outreach to white supremacists, etc.

Third, the Know Nothings were an essential catalyst to the dissolution of the Whig Party much like the Knickers to Republicans today. The Know Nothing movement seemed to come and go over a generation so that by the start of the Civil War it had largely disappeared. Turns out the Know Nothings in the North were more abolitionist than anti-immigrant and mostly joined the newly formed Republican Party. Millard Fillmore’s defeat illustrates the point when he came in a distant 3rd in the 1856 presidential election; instead, Democrat James Buchanan won and that was that. It remains to be seen how long Neo-Know Nothing Republicanism soldiers on though 15-20 years from its origins in June 2015 would put it on par with the original.
 
A fourth element to be considered is the unfortunate name itself: Know Nothings. Noone would ever choose such a name on purpose. Turns out that the original Know Nothings changed their name to the American Party as they realized their name sucked. This is still the case as calling someone a Neo-Know Nothing Republican can irritate as I can attest from my personal focus group that I am documenting in Neo-Know Nothing Republicans I Love (KnickersILove.com), at least until the historical context is explained. Fortunately for them, Knickers can just stay Republicans as they are the majority of the GOP.

​Fifth, Knickers, like the Know Nothings, tend to keep their most extreme views to themselves, others in the party, and maybe a few of their Facebook friends. This makes the fringes a little hard to communicate with, especially since our Twitter feed and Facebook pages have been shut down. This would seem to be very much in the spirit of the original Know Nothings who got their name from saying they didn’t know about the party. When asked about their views on immigrants and the mushrooming nativist organizations they were joining they said they knew nothing. Knickers similarly are often loathe to identify themselves (though the FBI is helping with their pictorial tweets of the most wanted from its Capitol Hill Violence webpage).
 
Knickers have a different take on knowing nothing as informed by conspiracy theories, media sources, neighbors and loved ones, etc. Per Joe Scarborough,

"It’s all, at the end of the day, about owning the Libs… To these demagogues, actually, owning the Libs now means owning science, owning medicine, owning reason, owning rationality. - Morning Joe, 3/3/21
 
Sixth, being anti-immigrant went hand in glove with being anti-Catholic, which, in the mid 1800’s meant Irish. They hated the Irish, even though the Irish were white. On the other hand, Knickers are not overtly this way though their enmity toward caravans of folks from the south in practice makes then kind of that way. Why so vilified? Same now as then I suppose, they are feared as a threat to white America – and our jobs - like Bogey and “Oomph Girl” Ann Sheridan dramatized in the 1937 film Black Legion.

By Steve Richards

The entire NkRA spectrum was on full display that day. From soccer moms to militia-types they were all there chanting and being uplifted as they beat up the cops. It all seemed like an agreeable day of spectacle…then cocktails, for many.

​But there was something missing. Their guns. Where were their guns? All that body armor and no guns?

When folks discuss how much worse it could have been they really seem to underestimate what they are talking about. The potential massacre was of old-testament proportions. Not quite Archangels hurling fire and brimstone, or outer space lasers for that matter, but with blazing possibilities, nonetheless. Since the weapons burnished were mostly of the baseball bat, stun gun, and zip-tie variety one can lose sight of what those citizens were capable of, in theory anyway.

Collectively however they showed that they didn’t need their guns. Especially when carrying one might make them targets for the police officers they were attacking. Plus, they were having so much fun without them! Some seemed like they might even be auditioning for clown school or something, like the guy with the horns, the guy with his feet on Pelosi’s desk and the guy dancing off with her lectern. It was like something from the Three Stooges.

​Folks were really looking forward to the follow up inauguration rallies pastors promised with musings like “…blood will flow out of the Capitol”, and the like. What a damper the 25,000 troops put on those. All over the country police and troops took all the air out it. Hardly anyone showed anywhere. Sort of like how it used to be at those neo-Nazi rallies in the old days. Like in the Blues Brothers when Jake and Elwood drove those brownshits off the bridge. 

​BySteve Richards
Managing Director, TheoEco Institute

To Our Readers:

Today's post represents a departure from our typical as we begin to dive deep into a new documentary we are producing, So Flo Guns or: My New Church the NkRA? We've been working on the film since 2018 and this essay has appeared twice before in evolving forms since 2016. Please forgive us if it leans too far into the political realm but it's impossible to discuss these topics without doing so. We hope it proves useful to our collective understanding of each other. - Steve R. 

​Back in 2016 I wrote about the NRA as a kind of alternative church I was thinking about joining. Since then, I never have been too regular a member at the NRA church though I’m giving its new arm a fresh look. 

Turns out there’s a schism going on with many of the fierier types separating into a new branch: The Neo-Know Nothing Religion of the Armed, or NkRA. How’s it different?

Just like 2016 I’ve read some thought-provoking Facebook posts from friends, family, and acquaintances recently. One even equated assault rifles to hammers as weapons used in killings (496 in 2011) and implied we need to control hammers if we are going to control assault rifles. Another said he packed a handgun in line at grocery stores, so he could protect himself and his neighbors in case a shooter attacked. Another said he’s a lion because he carries a gun while the rest of us are lambs.
​
Many Knickers I love (Neo-Know Nothing Republicans, an up-and-coming party of many NkRA members) take it up a notch with family posts about President Biden being a pedophile, and a friend or two explaining they might vote for Hitler today if he were running, assuming he supported policies they embrace.

Well, certainly being a lion sounds better than being a lamb, notwithstanding the Christian doctrine I’ve been following with its images of Jesus as shepherd, lamb; us as His flock, etc. These are crazy times after all, and Christianity seems a bit deficient, especially when one goes to a typical church nowadays where pews are plenty empty. Of course, being a NkRA devotee doesn’t mean you can’t still go to your old church if you feel like it. In fact, many Knickers still go to church on Easter and Christmas I’m assured.

So, I figure maybe this NkRA denomination just might be a reasonable facsimile for a church; especially since the passion it engenders seems so intense. But can it pass for a religion? Let’s see.

The natural inclination when trying to sum up Trump as an economic participant in the Gospels is to think along the lines of how he fits into the stories.

Can you imagine him saying or doing the things mentioned, and perhaps, which participant does he most emulate. Different readers will see that very differently I suspect. Many of his followers will think he bears much in common with Jesus Himself. Others might choose Lazarus. Still others Pilate.

It seems though that Herod is perhaps the best choice along these lines, as well as “The Man” in the parables, meaning the boss or master. Most of the parables have such a figure and it’s easy to see Trump in those roles.

The economy we see in the Gospels, when broken down and analogized to today, seems familiar in many ways.  Perhaps that is why the narrative, the stories, the people, the situations, the images seem relevant through the ages.

It’s easier in some ways to notice the things that aren’t there.  But what we see is that much of what we take for granted was there, albeit in more simple states: Agriculture?  Check.  Housing?  Check.  Lawyers?  Of course. We’ll get to a more robust discussion of Trump and Experts in the Law later.

As we reach the end of this series on Trump and Economics in the Gospels we find a chapter that finds little to talk about in reference to Trump.

Sure, we could talk about Ivanka and her clothing line but few ties in to Donald himself, per se. Aside from his ties perhaps being a bit too long – and there are no mentions of ties in the Gospels – his clothing is pretty standard stuff: suits, suits, suits. And golf attire. So, since no one dresses like Jesus or John the Baptist nowadays we’ll just let this chapter come straight from the original Economics in the Gospels without comment.

See if you can make a tie-in.

As we approach the inauguration we thought we would complete this series on Trump and Economics in the Gospels first begun in 2017.
​

To bring this, and other intriguing connections to the consumerist world in which we live, and which Trump, and his family (particularly Ivanka), take advantage of as entrepreneur, included in this instalment are more links than usual to make the connections.

Trump is an industry to himself with a seemingly endless array of products marketed with his image and imprimatur, and presumably, a royalty. What’s more basic to economics than that?

Amazon.com : trump merchandise

The Gospels include mention of a significant number of goods produced in what one might term the light-manufacturing of its day.  Items include nails, swords, tables, lamps, etc.

One could argue that this list of products are a good start on a list of essential items a society needs to function.  When added to the services/labor listed previously, and the construction activity evidenced as well, a picture of the Gospel economy emerges.

From steaks to golf gear, to Christmas ornaments and masks, the list goes on and on. Not to mention daughter Ivanka’s offerings or the merchandise sold at his properties, this list is virtually unlimited.

And let’s not forget those MAGA hats.

Frustratingly perhaps for free-marketers, Jesus seemed rarely to be a friend of the marketplace.
 
Mark 11:16 and he would not permit anyone to carry merchandise through the temple courts. 

By Steve Richards

United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

It’s about freedom of religion.

Nepal’s Christian community is increasingly underground; back to its roots you could say. There are arrests and imprisonments and the constant threat thereof, simply for doing what Evangelicals do: saving souls according to Christian principals some 2,000 years in the offing that encourage conversions of the believer as a natural consequence.

Nepali Christians are used to it. So too Christian based western NGO’s it would seem. An intended, and largely successful consequence, by the powers-that-be (largely Hindu centered) to keep the NGO’s largely separated from their Nepali brothers and sisters as NGO workers can also be arrested and deported if they aren’t careful. So, you have Western Christian groups in highly compromised positions. So close, and yet so far away.

I get it. I understand all too well the baggage that simply comes with the word Christianity. Say Jesus and a flood of personal experiences, opinions, relationships, etc. come rushing in. Including big chunks of those in the west who agree that Christianity has no place in a place like Nepal. Most afraid we are going to mess up perfectly good cultures with our double-edged swords of history, culture, and tangled religious-economic-ecological outcomes. Most 0like the idea of Nepal, sticking with its largely Hindu culture.

But this isn’t the point. It’s not up to us. Nepal has decided that freedom of religion is what they want. So much so that they have enshrined it in their constitution, just like we have in the USA and liberal democracies throughout the world. Here’s what Nepal’s constitution says:

Section 26 - Right to freedom of religion: (1) Every person who has faith in religion shall have the freedom to profess, practice and protect his or her religion according to his or her conviction…No person shall, in the exercise of the right conferred by this Article, do, or cause to be done, any act which may be contrary to public health, decency and morality or breach public peace, or convert another person from one religion to another or any act or conduct that may jeopardize other's religion and such act shall be punishable by law. https://constitutionnet.org/sites/default/files/2017-07/Constitution-of-Nepal-_English_-with-1st-Amendment_2_0.pdf

Sounds good right? Freedom of religion with limitations. It’s all well and good except for the part about converting another person. This makes the whole thing unworkable for religious minorities in Nepal. Don’t convert people? Don’t try to save their souls? It’s not in the evangelical DNA of Christianity ever since Christ directed folks to spread the word. Islam as well.

It wasn’t so long ago when there were virtually no Christians in Nepal. Until its opening in the 1950’s as a consequence of Sire Edmund Hillary’s expeditions to climb Mt. Everest it was a Hindu Kingdom dating back to pre-history - and still was when I first visited in 1998. A civil war ushered in a new constitution complete with religious freedoms and all that we take for granted in the USA, except for one glaring omission: the ability to convince others that your religion is the one and they should try it. That can put you in jail. So where is the freedom of speech? Where is the freedom of religion? How about freedom of assembly if you are assembling to hear the Word and consider baptism?

This principal of religious freedom is very much in the USA’s DNA as well. We take it for granted. It’s doubtful the pilgrims would have ever stepped foot on Plymouth Rock if not for the desire to be free to follow their religion. And this foundational Enlightenment principal found its way so elegantly in our constitution simply by saying there would be no laws at all about it in the very beginning of our Bill of Rights. The very first thing. Amendment 1 reads:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment

Freedom of religion is first and foremost because it is so integral to all the others.

This is not what they have in Nepal, They simply do not have freedom of religion. And they are therefore not free. Oh, compared to Chinese citizens just to the north they are, but compared to what they say they are, where they want to be, they aren’t quite there. Close but not quite you might say.

Why is this an issue? Is Nepal better off economically not guaranteeing these freedoms? Given that Nepal is one of the poorest nations on earth, and Christianity generally associated with economic growth as Max Weber in 1904 demonstrated in his: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/magazine/article/protestant-ethic-of-prosperity/

My personal experience includes years of relationships, days upon days of time, working together, praying together, worrying together, documenting, playing, preaching a few times, trekking to far away villages, attending baptisms, services, secret meetings, feeding, WiFi enabling, teaching, promoting, championing, loving, respecting, editing, producing, supporting, explaining, missing, and passionately advocating, for my friends in Nepal, Christian, Hindu, and Buddhist alike. It just so happens that I tend to run with the Christians.

You might think I am a particularly religious person, even a zealot. I’m not. I’m an environmentalist first and foremost. I research and write about Christ not to save souls but to show to Jesus’s followers how simply and harmoniously he coexisted with the earth. I’m more in line with Thomas Berry than Joel Osteen (of whom I’m a fan and follow on Twitter). I’m also a bit of an economist by training and am panicked by Capitalism’s effects on our environment. And knowing that Christianity is at the center of so much of the devastation via its underpinnings of Capitalism and western political economies, I study and write about Christianity’s intersections with the environment and economics.

So, what’s this got to do with Nepal’s Christians? Because while I’m not sure Capitalism and the ecology are particularly well suited to each other, I do have a sense that human rights are integral to an evolving communion between humankind and our planet. It is in TheoEco’s name where our ecology, economics, and theologies are inseparably woven and impacting each another.

To me, it’s not about Christianity in Nepal so much as the Christians themselves.

If a leading priest needs to go by Rev. X and take down a mini-documentary featuring him from YouTube I understand. If a Nepali Christian leader needs to stay off camera I get it. If Brother Barnabas needs to use an alias, I know he has a good reason. These people have families and ministries. And political and legal niceties are all well and good for a guy like me safely on the other side of the world where Christian edifices are so ubiquitous and our religious liberties guaranteed for hundreds of years now. But not when your flock is counting on you. Or your kids and spouses Shunning is the least of it.

As a result, it is very difficult to bring attention to these folks. They avoid websites, they use aliases, they need yet don’t want attention. Brother Barnabas is a top Christian leader though he also must stay underground You’ve seen him in our films though not under his alias. He is a tireless advocate in Nepal, not just for Christians but for all those that marginalize along religious lines. A real lover of democracy.

​Want to help? Join us this weekend…

​As we approach the inauguration we thought we would complete this series on Trump and Economics in the Gospels first begun in 2017.

At Christmas time 2020 we are in a time of feasting at Christmas though COVID-19 has made this one different than most. Feasts are hard to come by for many as food lines are ever present in the news throughout the USA, and throughout the world for many. Many are short of food at this, the time when feasts are usually had by most and loved ones gather.

The traditional feasting one would expect at the White House this time of year is non-existent though we are assured that Mar-a-Lago is offering feasting options. https://www.maralagoclub.com/dining.

In the time of the Gospels, as today, there was apparently a lot of big eating going on.  Feasts are some of the most commonly referenced activities, from the wedding where Jesus turned water into wine to the Last Supper.

Putting aside Trump’s most infamous feast, the fast food banquet for the Clemson Tigers, we find an intriguing analogy to Trump in Pontius Pilate’s pardon of one prisoner at the time of the Passover feasting. Of course, when Trump is pardoning so many one prisoner seems quaint.

Matthew 27:15 During the feast the governor was accustomed to release one prisoner to the crowd, whomever they wanted.

As we continue with the pardon theme we find an intriguing intersection with this segment of the study when Trump pardons two turkeys: Bread and Butter, Trump pardons two turkeys: Bread and Butter - BBC News.

Bread and Wine hold especially significant importance in the Gospels as the preeminent food and drink, and given their preponderance their production presumably accounted for significant portions of the economic output of the time.

Of course, this is no real surprise to most Christians as the two foods are sacred and discussed over and over again in churches throughout the world as the body and blood of Jesus – capable of saving souls and an everlasting gift to God’s people.

Trump, when a Presbyterian (He is reportedly now a "nondenominational Christian.")  is quoted as saying:

"We I take, when we go, and church and when I drink my little wine -- which is about the only wine I drink -- and have my little cracker, I guess that's a form of asking for forgiveness, and I do that as often as possible because I feel cleansed,” https://washingtonmonthly.com/2015/07/20/trump-the-believer/

In a specific economic context, there was obviously a great deal of wine production.  As mentioned previously, it must have contributed appreciably to the overall GDP of its day.  We can see references to vineyards throughout the parables and mentions of vines, grapes, wineskins, winepress, etc.  Intriguingly, John the Baptist is supposed to never drink the stuff:

Luke 1:15 for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He must never drink wine or strong drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit, even before his birth.

Trump is also famous for not drinking, aside from communion wine apparently as we saw in the aforementioned quote.

Trump at this writing is either going to be seen as a Santa or a Grinch, depending upon his veto of the latest COVID relief bill. Given the trillions of new national debt one can argue that he has facilitated some of the most extreme largess in American history. Unfortunately, it is all financed with public debt engineered with modern economic tools and theory unknown in Jesus’ time.

In conclusion, Trump would likely be glad about the following passage.

Mark 4:25 For whoever has will be given more, but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him.”

By Steve Richards

Now imagine all of this but with a monthly income of $86, the average monthly income of a Nepali. Forget that they just got through the monsoons with no A/C and head into winter with no central heat, just a hefty winter blanket and body heat from loved ones. Add to this: landslides, floods, and the actual smell of death in the villages on really bad days for some.

Now Imagine all this hardship while being a tiny Christian minority. Many wonder that there are Christians in Nepal at all. Nepal is sandwiched between two ascending rivals: India and China. It is a new democracy and no superpower. Except perhaps in spirit.

Nepal has largely been shut down in the same way as most everywhere else. Stay inside mainly. Masks, social distancing, waiting for a vaccine. Tough folks Nepalis. Something we all share? Resiliency. Though we happen to be rich in comparison.

It is these same folks that we celebrate in A Kathmandu Christmas.

What is harder for us to empathize with are the social stigmas based in Nepal’s Hindu caste system roots, even with one of the most progressive constitutions in all of Asia. Our friend Brother Barnabas in Katmandu, a Christian leader of the highest order, relates that they are in a situation that five types of disasters seem to be aiming at them all at once: natural, economic, social, political, and even the religious.

He writes in his most recent newsletter:

​Four screenings make for four separate parties and opportunities to join the festivities. All times are Eastern Standard Time in the USA. Of course, feel free to attend any, or all of our screenings. We’ll be happy to see you anytime.

• Screening #1 - 9 AM EST is 7:45 PM in the evening in Kathmandu – This screening is largely for our friends in Nepal and early birds in the USA. 
• Screening #2 - 2 PM EST is our matinee for the USA and hopefully a convenient time for our supporters in Europe. 
• Screening #3 - 7 PM EST is the primary time for us on the east coast. 
• Screening #4 -  9 PM EST is hopefully a good time for those in the other time zones of the USA including our good friends in California. 

​All screenings take place in TheoEco’s Zoom theater found here.

The party is free though please feel free to make a donation as it is a fundraiser for our Nepal projects and for our co-hosts and sponsors through their peer-to-peer links. You might also want to hold your own group Zoom parties with you and yours, then come into TheoEco’s Zoom theater shortly before the screening time. We’ll then start at the appointed time with a quick hello and holiday cheer with the 40-minute film starting shortly thereafter. Immediately after the film we will talk with Amit Nepali and others in Nepal for some Q & A. Total event times will likely run an hour and half or so.

So please make an appearance and maybe see some old friends. Unfortunately, as a Zoom event this is strictly BYOB but you should certainly make a get-together out of it if so inclined. We will be dressing in our holiday finery and drinking eggnog for sure!

Hoping to see you there and wishing you the very best for the season.

To register click here.